The Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019 as it allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. 
 
<h3>Is gerrymandering is a major problem in the United States? </h3>
The United States Supreme Court has declared in Millerv. Johnson( 1995) that ethnical gerrymandering is a violation of indigenous rights and upheld opinions against redistricting that's deliberately cooked grounded on race. still, the Supreme Court has plodded when prejudiced gerrymandering occurs. 
It allowed prejudiced gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the bar. The manipulation may correspond of" cracking"( lacing the voting power of the opposing party's sympathizers across numerous sections) or" packing"( concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one quarter to reduce their voting power in other sections). Gerrymandering can also be used to cover incumbents. 
 
Learn further about the Supreme court here: https//brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a 
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest. 
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Not it was not The bill of rights was more like the ground work for the constitution
Explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
answer:
an election in which a goverener is elected by the people to represent that state in congress
psa:
*please do not just copy my answer it was meant to help you not just give you anything to put down!  
*if you think my answer is good or will get an A please give me brainliest or high stars.  
*love yourself. you're beautiful, i promise.  
*please treat people with kindness, wear a mask, and have a lovely day.