1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
4 years ago
9

A person who has suffered a major stroke and is now experiencing severe personality problems because of the damage would best be

advised to see a ________.
Social Studies
2 answers:
natita [175]4 years ago
6 0
Would be advised to see a Neurologist
alexandr1967 [171]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Psychiatrist

Explanation:

A psychiatrist is a doctor who specializes in psychiatry. Psychiatry is the branch of medicine that studies mental disorders. This is significantly different from psychologists, who are not medical doctors. Therefore, psychiatrists often use methods that resemble those of doctors who study physical illnesses. Psychiatrists can provide medicine, as well as psychotherapy and medical management.

You might be interested in
PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS
marishachu [46]

Answer:

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties.   Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements. The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes. The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people. First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt. The Government View of Treaties The First Nations View of Treaties The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on.   In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum. As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible. Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation. Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin. also Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people and Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
expert thought often involves calling upon knowledge and past experience instead of relying on rules (such as a person who doesn
iragen [17]

Expert thought is sometimes described as: Intuitive

<h3>What do intuitive thoughts imply?</h3>

Intuitive thinking entails acting on one's gut instincts and making quick decisions based on automatic cognitive processes. Reflective thinking involves questioning first instincts and considering alternative options, allowing for counterintuitive decisions.

Researchers have proposed four types of intuitive thinking, each distinct and unique but easily identifiable in most situations:

  • Mental intuition
  • Intuitive emotional thinking
  • Psychic intuitive reasoning
  • Spiritual intuitive reasoning

While intuitive thinking is an important part of problem solving, it can lead to errors in fact-based situations. People who think intuitively are less efficient decision makers and frequently suffer from cognitive biases.

Using your intuition has several advantages, including: One of the most significant benefits of intuition is that it allows you to make quick and effective decisions in complex and unfamiliar situations.

To know more about Intuitive thinking refer:

brainly.com/question/12450483

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Leaders who are effective cross-culturally are curious about and interested in different cultures. True False
Mekhanik [1.2K]
True, hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The leaders of a small country decide that they need to enact a contractionary fiscal policy. Which action is consistent with th
Over [174]
The correct answer for this question is this one: "A reduction in government spending is consistent with a contractionary fiscal policy." The leaders of a small country decide that they need to enact a contractionary fiscal policy. The action that is consistent with this fiscal policy is that a reduction in government spending is consistent with a contractionary fiscal policy.<span>
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
One of the side effects of ect is:
EastWind [94]
C. memory loss can be permanent
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Computer abuse involves the commission of acts involving the computer that may not be illegal but are considered unethical.
    7·1 answer
  • How did mesopotamia's geography help civilization to develop in the area
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the ability to speak and understand language so remarkable?
    5·1 answer
  • Saffexo, a company that manufactures sports goods, hikes the prices of its entire range of athletic shoes. However, the company
    13·1 answer
  • The Abbasid Caliphate benefitted MOST from which of these in the latter centuries of the First Millennium?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following translates into a capacity to sense, understand, and tap into the highest parts of ourselves, others, and
    9·1 answer
  • What were the major similarities and differences between the three political parties active in the gilded age?
    5·1 answer
  • How does Seasonal vegetable farming help to make money
    12·2 answers
  • Does the constitution address all of the concerns that arose during the time of articles of confederation? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • Taught that there was no absolute right and wrong.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!