Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
Answer:
lender.
Explanation:
A lender is an individual or company that makes funds available another com[any. Lenders receive fixed payments based on a predetermined rate at an agreed time.
A shareholder is the owner of a company. A shareholder is a person who buys the stock of a publicly traded company
Supplier provides raw materials needed for production to a company
An investor can either be a lender or shareholder
Answer:
Variable cost
Explanation:
because sometimes companies set fixed price to other product
Answer:
(d) Manufacturing Overhead $8,000 Raw Materials $8,000
Explanation:
This will be an spending associate with the actual overhead.
These materials are indirect, so it should go in the factory overhead account.
They are not associate with any job in particular, so it cannot be capitalize through work in process.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. The company's total book value of debt will be:
= Value of debt + Value of zero coupon bonds
= $70 million + $100 million
= $170 million
b. The market value will be:
= Quoted price × Par value
= ($70 × 1.08) + ($100 × 0.61)
= $75.6 + $61
= $136.6 million
c. The aftertax cost of debt will be:
= (1 - Tax rate) × Pre tax cost of debt
= (1 - 35%) × 5.7%
= 65% × 5.7%
= 3.7%
