The laws governing intellectual property are where common-law and code-law systems most obviously diverge.
<h3>
What is intellectual property ?</h3>
The collection of intangible assets that a company or person possesses and is legally entitled to guard against illegal use or application by third parties is referred to as intellectual property.
The concept of intellectual property was developed on the premise that some works produced by the human mind should be afforded the same legal protections as material possessions.
Hence, the difference between common-law and code-law systems is found in the laws pertaining to intellectual property.
Learn more about Intellectual property here:
brainly.com/question/17348419
#SPJ1
Answer:
A. An operating expense.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the self insurance activity i.e. accounted for an internal service fund that paid the amount of $365,000. Also as we know that the internal service fund is a proprietary fund so the claim should be reported as an operating expenses in the revenues, expenses and change in net asset statement
Therefore the correct option is a.
Answer:
Explanation:
.......................................................... Raise?
Answer:
C. an increase in earnings of $0.20 per share, with no change in the multiple, would result in a market price increase of $2.40 per share.
Explanation:
The P/E ratio (also sometimes called "the multiple") is simply the current price per share divided by the earnings per share. (Price / Earnings = P/E) If you multiply both sides of that equation by Earnings, you get Price = P/E * Earnings.
So if you have P/E = 12 and Earnings = $2.50/share, the price would be 12 * 2.50/share = $30/share. That means a) and b) are both wrong.
It also means that 12 times the change in earnings will tell you the change in price (if the P/E multiple doesn't change). So a 0.20 rise in earnings will raise the stock price by 12 times that amount or $2.40/share. So c) is the correct answer.
Gertrude I believe not 100 percent
