They can write a list of what they can to improve the environment with everyone else, and maybe have a discussion about how they can participate in the class activity of tree planting.
B. Their desire for rewards.
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
Answer: Because of his i<u>nflexible</u> attitude, the King had become a <u>menace</u> to his people. Although he had ruled for 40 years by <u>mutual</u> consent of his countrymen, the King had placed himself in an <u>advantageous </u>position by mounting a large army to defend his castle, and had secured great wealth and a very large kingdom.
As the King looked down at his <u>gnarled </u>fingers, he realized that to <u>incite </u>the people with even more taxes would be foolish. At his age, and with his health failing, soon his sons and daughters would <u>inherit </u>his vast kingdom, and his more than <u>adequate</u> wealth. Why risk the chance of having opposing forces <u>descend </u>upon his castle? To <u>enhance</u> his wealth at this time could only lead to disaster.
Explanation:
It can help you understand the information better
