1.. A train travels at a speed of 58 km/hr. If it goes from one station to the next in 1.6 hours, how far has it traveled?

The solution to the system is (6,2) Select all the equations that could be the other equation in the system. PLZ HELPPPPPP there

Dovator [93]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

A, C

Step-by-step explanation:

The attached graph shows which lines go through the given point. They are ...

y = 1/2x -1 . . . . 1st selection

y = -1/6x +3 . . . 3rd selection

__

The equations can be found algebraically by substituting the given point in the equation and seeing if the result is a true statement.

a) 2 = (1/2)(6) -1 = 3 -1 . . . true

b) 2 = -3(6) . . . . false

c) 2 = -1/6(6) +3 = -1 +3 . . . true

d) 2 = 2/3(6) -1 = 4 -1 . . . . false

e) 2 = 4(6) -2 = 24 -2 . . . . false

f) 2 = -3/2(6) +6 = -9 +6 . . . . false

6 0

2 years ago

Dont play with me just answer the question

OleMash [197]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

two planes traveling in opposite directions leave the airport at the same time. in 4 hours they are they are 2900 miles apart. i

marta [7]

I Got 650 miles per hour

6 0

3 years ago

Is the simplified form of 2-3 + 3.3 rational?<br> Yes<br> No

N76 [4]

Answer:

YES IT IS

Step-by-step explanation:

2-3 + 3.3

= -1 + 3.3

= -4.3

We learn that:

Rational number: rational number is the number that can be written as a/b (a and b would be intergers and b is not equal to 0). Rational number would be most of numbers we use in out life, except Square root and Pi number.

In this case, -4.3 can be write as -43/10

So YES it would be a rational number

Hope this helped :3

6 0

3 years ago

The effect of a monetary incentive on performance on a cognitive task was investigated. The researcher predicted that greater mo

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

1) $H_0:\mu_5=\mu_{25}=\mu_{50}$

2) $H_a:\mu_{50}>\mu_{25}>\mu_{5}$

3) A Type I error happens when we reject a null hypothesis that is true. In this case, that would mean that the conclusion is that there is evidence to support the claim that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles are solved, but that in reality there is no significant difference.

4) A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. In this case, that would mean that there is no enough evidence to support the claim that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles are solved, but in fact this is true.

5) The probability of a Type I error is equal to the significance level, as this is the chance of having a sample result that will make the null hypothesis be rejected.

Step-by-step explanation:

As the claim is that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles were solved, the null hypothesis will state that this claim is not true. That is that there is no significant relation between the incentive and the amount of puzzles that are solved. In other words, the mean amount of puzzles solved for the different incentives is equal (or not significantly different):

$H_0:\mu_5=\mu_{25}=\mu_{50}$

The research (or alternative hypothesis) is that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles were solved. That means that the mean puzzles solved for an incentive of 50 cents is significantly higher than the mean mean puzzles solved for an incentive of 25 cents and this is significantly higher than the mean puzzles solved for an incentive of 5 cents.

$H_a:\mu_{50}>\mu_{25}>\mu_{5}$

A Type I error happens when we reject a null hypothesis that is true. In this case, that would mean that the conclusion is that there is evidence to support the claim that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles are solved, but that in reality there is no significant difference.

A Type II error happens when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. In this case, that would mean that there is no enough evidence to support the claim that the greater the incentive, the more puzzles are solved, but in fact this is true.

The probability of a Type I error is equal to the significance level, as this is the chance of having a sample result that will make the null hypothesis be rejected.

4 0

3 years ago