Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
Answer:
His writings on religious tolerance and freedom of thought and expression helped spread the ideas of the Enlightenment. Enlightenment thinkers disputed the idea that kings actually ruled by divine right and questioned the union of church and state and the unequal rights of different social classes.
The answer is b. Civil court because it isn’t a criminal matter so they wouldn’t go to criminal court meaning it can’t be a they are neighbors not family members so they wouldn’t go to family court so it isn’t c and it isn’t d because in order to go to appeals court you have to have already gone to court and the prompt does not state that they are appealing the verdict of a previous court case
