Answer:
raising prices to customers (in order to cover the high costs).
Explanation:
Supply-side economist can be defined as economists who believes that the ability and willingness of the producers of goods and services to manufacture or produce sets the pace for the economic growth of a country.
This ultimately implies that, increasing the supply of goods and services would cause an economic growth for a country.
Options for attacking or mitigating the high costs of items purchased from suppliers do not include, the seller such as a retailer raising prices to customers in a bid to cover the high costs incurred from the supply.
However, the seller could pressure his or her supplier to lower the cost, switch to a cheaper substitute products, and creating a collaborative effort with the supplier for mutual cost-saving opportunities in the market.
The Stackelberg solution can be used to find the perfect or stable Nash equilibrium or equilibria.
<h3>What is this equilibrium about?</h3>
Other answers:
Based on the above, Note that the strategy profile is one where one serves best each player, and based on the strategies of the other player and it covers the fact that all player playing in a Nash equilibrium must be in every subgame.
Note also that The Stackelberg leadership model is said to be a kind off strategic game that is played in economics where the leader firm is known to moves first and then the follower firms is said to then move in a sequential manner and I think, the solution do not change if stackelberg game is considered in the long run.
I believe that the stackelberg leader will not collude with the stackelberg follower but in a lot of cases, there may be a collusion.
Yes, a Stackelberg leader can be more likely or less likely to merge with the follower firm as a merger can be profitable to them.
Learn more about equilibrium from
brainly.com/question/517289
#SPJ1
Between 30 and 90 days after the disability occurs
To find the value of the inventory to the nearest cent:
Estimated costs are: $18,750
Storage costs: 12%
Interest costs: 12%
Transportation costs: 5%
Let's add the costs up: 12% + 12% + 5% = 29%
We are solving for the value of inventory so in this case we will make that X.
X = estimated costs/interest amounts
X = $18,750/29%
X = $18,750/0.29
X = $64,655.17
The value of the inventory is $64,655.17
To check your work you can take $64,655.17 and multiply it by 29%
= $18,750
