All categories

2 years ago

Tyler was shoving an equation and his last line of work read -12=12. What does this mean

Mathematics

2 answers:

wolverine [178]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

-12 = 12 ....this is incorrect...meaning no solutions

if it ended in :

x = a number, or y = a number...means there is 1 solution

if it ended in :

-12 = 12....incorrect answer, means there is no solutions

if it ended in :

2 = 2 or -4 = -4....correct answer, but not variable...means infinite solutions

aksik [14]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

144

You might be interested in

I forgot how to do this n they didn’t put an example help me lol

lyudmila [28]

Answer:

60 $m^2$

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the area of the square as it the missing piece wasn't missing.

8 x 9 = 72 $m^2$

Then, find the area of the missing section.

3 x 4 = 12 $m^2$

Finally, subtract 12 $m^2$ from 72 $m^2$ and you get 60 $m^2$

3 0

2 years ago

For a specific species of fish in a pond, a wildlife biologist wants to build a regression equation to predict the weight of a f

sashaice [31]

Answer: First of all, we will add the options.

A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.

C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.

D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.

The correct option is D.

Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.

As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.

3 0

3 years ago

SO CONFUSED PLEASE SOMEONE EXPLAIN! DUE SOON AND NEED HELP!!!!!!!! QUESTION IN PICTURE BELOW

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

=> Apply law of cosine

$c^2=a^2+b^2-2abcos\left(C\right)$

=> input value

$z^2=6.5^2 + 9.4^2-\left(6.5\right)\left(9.4\right)\left(cos\left(131\right)\right)$

=> simplify

$z=\sqrt{\left(6.5^2+\:9.4^2\right)-\left(6.5\right)\left(9.4\right)\left(-0.65605902899\right)}$

=> calulcation

$z=\sqrt{-61.1\cos \left(131^{\circ \:}\right)+130.61},\:z=-\sqrt{-61.1\cos \left(131^{\circ \:}\right)+130.61}$

=> apply rule: Distance must be greater than 0

which is about 14.51828

4 0

2 years ago

Can somebody please help

horsena [70]

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 90⁰ + 90⁰ + 120⁰ = 360 ....sum of angles of quadrilatral is 360⁰

x = 60⁰...

7 0

2 years ago

If the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a polygon is 1920°, how many sides does it have?

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

<u>The regular polygon has 13 sides</u>

Correct statement and question:

If the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a polygon is 1980°, how many sides does it have?

Source:

1,920° is not a valid value for a regular polygon. It should be either 1,980° or 1,800° (it has to be a multiple of 180). We pick 1,980° to answer the question.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's recall that the formula of the sum of the interior angles of any polygon is:

Sum of Interior Angles = (n-2) * 180°, where n is the number of sides of the polygon.

Therefore, replacing with the value we know:

1,980 = (n-2) * 180

n - 2 = 1,980/180

n - 2 = 11

7 0

3 years ago