1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
3 years ago
11

In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni

ng would convince a reasonable person that he or she is not free to leave?
Law
1 answer:
german3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

You might be interested in
In U.S. trade law, Section 301, cases involve accusations of a. international dumping by U.S. companies. b. trade embargoes by f
malfutka [58]

Answer: d. Opposes government interference in international trade.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
In 1825 Louisiana wrote what set of laws?
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer: The Louisiana Civil Code

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Who decides whether a suspect will be tried for an alleged crime?
Lerok [7]

Answer:

the judge

Explanation:

i looked it up

don't trust me tho

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reform schools, workhouses, and poorhouses were seen as avenues for reforming offenders during the _____.
Mkey [24]
I want to say the nineteenth century not 100% sure though
3 0
3 years ago
What are opinions or feelings about the candidates(2020 debate) ?
Papessa [141]
I think that it was completely childish. i mean don’t get me wrong, it was hilarious, but trump really really annoyed me. neither of them could get a proper answer out and it annoyed the hell out of me. the fact that trump didn’t denounce white supremacy just didn’t sit right with me
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Contrast the medical model of addiction with the criminal model of addiction. Explain which model you think that America more cl
    11·1 answer
  • 1 What does "You have the right to remain silent" mean? A You have the right to free speech B You don't have to testify against
    13·1 answer
  • The principle that the rules of a legal system apply equally to all persons, institutions, and entities—public or private—that m
    15·1 answer
  • whats PINS in ny? My school sent me a letter said I need PINS and there going to contact the court because of me.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms is not recognized in Canadian law?
    14·2 answers
  • Under Miranda vs. Arizona, police must advise suspects of all but which of the following rights:
    7·1 answer
  • C) Write the correct option:
    9·1 answer
  • I Need Help this is my Exam
    8·2 answers
  • 4. What is the leading critique of the electoral college?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain which of the United Nations purposes you think is the most important.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!