gambling is never included in GDP, hence it has no effect on GDP.
<h3>What is a part of GDP?</h3>
GDP is made up of goods and services produced for market consumption as well as certain nonmarket production, such as defense or educational services offered by the government. A different definition that takes into account total national output is the gross national product, or GNP.
<h3>What impact does gambling have on the economy?</h3>
The economy's overall demand for products and services rises as a result of gambling. One out of every ten dollars spent by Americans in 1996 went toward commercial gaming. The economy is directly stimulated by this money. When the multiplier impact is taken into account, this gambling-related expense may also be increased.
To know more about gambling GDP. increases. visit:-
brainly.com/question/20849462
#SPJ4
Douglas MacArthur,
In July 1941, MacArthur was recalled to active duty and became commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific. A Japanese invasion of the Philippines that same year drove MacArthur’s forces from the country, but in the years that followed, MacArthur launched a number of successful offensive operations against the Japanese military in the region. During this time, he was frequently and openly critical of his superiors’ decision to focus military resources on the war in Europe rather than in the Pacific.
Answer:
The answer you are wanting is E "authorized Congress to implement a graduated income tax."
Explanation:
Hi there! Basically, the16th ammendment allowed the Congress to impose an income tax that didn't have to be divded among states due to population. In short, the government can collect income tax from <em>all </em>Americans. It gave Congress the right to impose a Federal income tax.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
"Secondary analysis" seems to be the right answer.
Explanation:
- Secondary analysis or assessment seems to be a technique whereby secondary information is used in science. It saves the company money as either a survey instrument, as well as eliminates the needless credibility of the research committee.
- This is typically differentiated from the current study, which seems to be the study including its primary data something that an investigator separately collects.
And for the specified circumstance to be a secondary analysis.
