I’m so sorry if it’s wrong but I believe it’s either between... the first option- move toward more or the 3rd option- cautiously embraced. But if I were to choose which one I think I would go with the 1st option as my answer
Answer: move toward more
Explanation: Because of nearly all composers use dissonance in their music. Without dissonance, there would be no tension and release in music and it would all be VERY boring and bland. Dissonances are nothing new at all and certainly not restricted to the 20th century; in the 14th and 15th centuries these could be quite harsh and not always resolved in the way we would expect today.
Dissonance adds expression to music and as composers' techniques became more and more sophisticated, so did the harmonic language. Dissonance can be used for musical 'colour' and to create extreme tension and drama in music.
In short, composers in the 20th (and 21st) century used dissonance for very similar reasons to composers in every other century.
According to yahoo.com
The Judiciary Act of 1789 made allocated Six justices to the Supreme Court. This six judge system lasted until 1807. At this time, Congress increased the number to seven. In 1837, the number of Supreme Court justices was then increased to nine. The amount of judges would change several more times before it was officially decided that this branch would have nine judges (like it does today).
He lived at Knossos for periods of nine years, where he received instruction from Zeus in the legislation which he gave to the island
