Answer:
The rate that will give the same effective annual rate of return is 0.033%.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
APR = 12%
Semi-annual compound rate = 6% (12/2)
Assumed calendar days in a year = 360 days
Effective daily rate of return = 12%/360 = 0.033%
b) The conversion of semi-annual compounding to daily compounding results in reduced rate of return. In this case, we assume that there are 360 days in a year. Since the APR = 12%, it means that the daily rate of return will be 12%/360, which is 0.033%.
Answer:
Derived demand accelerates changes in markets.
Explanation:
Derived demand can be defined as the way in which the demand for a good or service tend to result from the demand for the related good or service and this occured when their is the demand for either good that are tangible or intangible goods where a market exists for both related goods and services.
In another word Derived demand occured in a situation where the demand for one good or service happens because of the want for another good or service Example is increase in the need for Shoes material or equipment because of the increase in the need for Shoes
because the factor of production by a company is dependent on the demand by consumers for the product produced by that company which is why the transition to become demand-driven is slowly occurring in many industries.
Hence, The factor that increases the volatility of demand in industrial markets is "Derived demand accelerates changes in markets"
Answer:
Explanation:
We shall apply the concept of coefficient of variation to know the consistency of data
coefficient of variation
= standard deviation / mean or average
In case of City A
coefficient of variation = 86 / 820
= .1048
In case of City B
coefficient of variation = 75 / 790
= .0949
Since it is less for city B , rent for this city is more consistence or with less of variation
So the conclusion is false.
Purchasing diverse types of mass media
Answer:
Proxy Fight
Explanation:
Proxy fight refers to that scenario wherein a group of shareholders coming together so as to gain more shareholder proxies and thus gain majority of the votes.
In such cases, outsiders convince the existing shareholders of a corporation to vote against the management and thus collectively lead to it's replacement.
This represents one of the common means of corporate takeover.
Disgruntled shareholders may unite against a management decision or any sort of oppressive policies by such means, usurp the existing management and appoint their own preferred candidates as their replacement.