A whole number that would support Cindys claim would be 2 because if u do the ,math it would be 8/24 which would be .333 repeating which is simplify to 1/3 and i do not know a number that would not work
The answer is b hope this helps
Since in 1990 there are 28%, we need to figure out when it gets to 31%. In addition, since it increases by 0.6% every year, we can say that 0.6x+28 (since 28 is the base value) is the percentage of babies born in wedlock every year. Therefore, to get 0.6x+28=31, we subtract 28 from both sides to get 0.6x=3
Dividing both sides by 0.6, we get x=5=the amount of years it takes to get 31% of babies born in wedlock. Since 1990 is the base value (we start from there!), we add 5 to that to get 1990+5=1995 as the yar
No.
If a rational number can be an integer, x and y could be 5.5 and .5, or something that adds up to (number).0. This means, if the two non-rational numbers add up, they could be irrational, but the result isn't.