All categories

3 years ago

Do ΔCBG and ΔFEG in the figure appear to be similar? Why or why not?

Mathematics

2 answers:

astra-53 [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

They're not similar because only one pair of corresponding angles in the two triangles is congruent.

Mama L [17]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: Option C. They're not similar because only one pair of corresponding angles in the two triangles is congruent.

Solution:

The only one pair of corresponding angles in the two triangles is congruent is the angle BGC in ΔCBG and the angle FGE in ΔFEG, because they are vertical angles (opposite by the vertex)

You might be interested in

Graph the line.<br>y - 4x = -8

stiv31 [10]

X = -8-y/4 hope this helps

8 0

2 years ago

Multiply out and simplify the expression (n+1)^2-(n+1)+1

topjm [15]

Answer:

7-5n

Step-by-step explanation:

first you multiply both sides and get the equation 2n+2-7n+7 then you rearange the numbers to 2n-7n +2+7 and get -5n+7. you can change that to 7-5n.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1) 448

aivan3 [116]

Answer:

What do I have to do?? I don't understand

3 0

3 years ago

What is the answer? Links will be reported. ( BRANLIEST )

qaws [65]

Answer:

$- 1 \frac{1}{8} m + \frac{3}{10} \\$

Step-by-step explanation:

$\frac{7}{8} m + \frac{9}{10} - 2m - \frac{3}{5} \\ \frac{7}{8} m - 2m + \frac{9}{10} - \frac{3}{5} \\ \frac{7}{8} m - \frac{2m \times 8}{1 \times 8} + \frac{9}{10} - \frac{3 \times 2}{5 \times 2} \\ \frac{7m - 16m}{8} + \frac{9 - 6}{10} \\ - \frac{9}{8} m + \frac{3}{10} \\ - 1 \frac{1}{8} m + \frac{3}{10} \\$

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Mario claims that if the dinominator of a fraction is a prime number, then its decimal form is a repeting decimal. Do you agree?

vodomira [7]

Answer:

I do not agree because Mario's claim is not general.

Step-by-step explanation:

Prime numbers: These are a set of numbers that are divisible by 1 and itself only. Examples are: 2, 3, 5, 7. 11 etc.

And a denominator is the divisor in a given fraction.

Considering the following fractions whose denominators are prime numbers:

$\frac{2}{3}$ = 0.66666666...

$\frac{1}{7}$ = 0.142857142

$\frac{5}{11}$ = 0.45454545...

$\frac{3}{13}$ = 0.23076923

$\frac{1}{7}$ = 0.142857142

It could be observed that Mario's claim is not a general principle which is applicable to all fractions with a prime denominator. Thus, I do not agree with his claim.

4 0

2 years ago