All categories

2 years ago

What is the length of the missing leg

Mathematics

2 answers:

Shtirlitz [24]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the pythagorean theorem, we know that a^2+ b^2=c^2

In our case, we know b, which is 5 and c which is 13.

If we plug that into the equation, we get a^2+ 5^2 = 13^2

Next, we simplify the equation. a^2 + 25 = 169

Then we subtract 25 from 169. 169 - 25 = 144.

Lastly, we do the square root of 144 and we get 12 which is the missing side.

Leona [35]2 years ago

6 0

Answer: 12 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

Use Pythagorean Theorem to find the missing side.

a^2 + 5^2 = 13^2

a^2 + 25 = 169

subtract 25 from both sides

a^2 = 144

take the square root of both sides

a = 12

You might be interested in

A number was multiplied by 6 then increased by 3 and the result was 33

Nina [5.8K]

The number that you are trying to find is 5

3 0

3 years ago

If having a warranty on a car is important a person should buy a car that is _______

Ket [755]

Answer:

the answer is new

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the test

7 0

2 years ago

Rachel wants to replace the wooden floor at her gym. The floor is in the shape of a rectangle. Its length is 45 feet and its wid

lesya692 [45]

Answer:

$14175

Step-by-step explanation:

1. multiply 45 and 35 , which is equal to 1575

2. now, since they gave you the unit rate now all you have to do is just multiply 1575 ft and $9 , which is equal to $14175.

8 0

3 years ago

Please help with trig hw

Darya [45]

Answer:

i am way

Step-by-step explanation:

to youn for thi

8 0

2 years ago

A researcher wanted to test the claim that, "Seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities." A simple random sample of front-s

GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

$z = \frac{0.00206 -0.0110}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00206*(1-0.00206)}{7765} +\frac{0.0110*(1-0.0110)}{2823}}}= -4.405$

Now we can find the p value since we are using a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v = P(z$

Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and then the best conclusion would be:

B) Since p <a, we conclude that this data shows that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following info given from the problem

$X_1 =31$ number of people killed with occupants not wering seat belts

$n_1 = 2823$ number of people not wearing seat belts

$\hat p_1 =\frac{31}{2823}=0.0110$ represent the estimated proportion of people killed not wearing seatbelts

$X_2 =16$ number of people killed with occupants using wering seat belts

$n_2 = 7765$ number of people using wearing seat belts

$\hat p_2 =\frac{16}{7765}=0.00206$ represent the estimated proportion of people killed wearing seatbelts

We want to check if seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities, so we want to test the following system of hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $p_2 \geq p_1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_2$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$z = \frac{\hat p_2 -\hat p_1}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1 (1-\hat p_1)}{n_1} +\hat p_2 (1-\hat p_2)}{n_2}}}$

And replacing we got:

$z = \frac{0.00206 -0.0110}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00206*(1-0.00206)}{7765} +\frac{0.0110*(1-0.0110)}{2823}}}= -4.405$

Now we can find the p value since we are using a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v = P(z$

Since the p value is very low compared to the significance level of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and then the best conclusion would be:

B) Since p <a, we conclude that this data shows that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

8 0

3 years ago