1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mademuasel [1]
3 years ago
15

To reduce the self-destructive behavior of some children with autism spectrum disorder, a therapist might squirt water at them w

henever they bite themselves. the squirt of water is a:
Social Studies
1 answer:
xenn [34]3 years ago
6 0
<span>The squirt of water is a positive punishment. A positive punishment is to do something undesirable (squirt of water to the face) when an individual does an undesired behavior. The idea is that this will stop them from doing the undesired behavior.</span>
You might be interested in
Plz answer I will friend if you do answer Why do friends and businesses not work together well?
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

answer is below

Explanation:

Friends and businesses do not work well because you would spend more time with your business partner than you do with your family. Having friends at work can increase job satisfaction, performance and productivity, research shows. But you might want to avoid becoming too close with your colleagues to avoid any further problems in the future. If there are any problems with in business this may mess up the friendship you have with the friend.

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Egyptians spend years and many resources to build enormous tombs for their dead pharaohs?
LuckyWell [14K]
Egyptians believed that they had eternal spirits which made them think that they could rule the world even after they were dead and that whatever they had in this life they would need in the next. Therefore, they stuffed there tombs full of stuff to use in the afterlife
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Recall that ed diener and his colleagues monitored almost thirty homes throughout the city of seattle on halloween night. they r
xenn [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

Recall that ed diener and his colleagues monitored almost thirty homes throughout the city of seattle on halloween night. they recorded whether each trick-or-treater arrived alone or in a group. the researchers also randomly asked some children arriving alone and some arriving in groups to provide their names and addresses. the results of this study showed that children were more likely to take more treats than they were supposed to if they arrived ________ and if they were ________. in a group;

in a group; asked to provide their names and addresses

alon,; NOT asked to provide their names and addresses

in a group; NOT asked to provide their names and addresses*

8 0
3 years ago
Communicating with the dead is called what?
denis23 [38]
Channel can be a word
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This map shows global variations in the fertility rate in 2014. The legend gives the number of children born per woman that year
    12·2 answers
  • Why was the vietnam war iconic?
    12·2 answers
  • Which factor has the greatest positive effect on the late 19th century American industrialization
    11·1 answer
  • What country stands out as being a developed country where private individuals are required to pay the majority of health care?
    14·2 answers
  • What is probably the most convincing explanation for european expansion?
    13·1 answer
  • Based on Lincoln's speech, how can the men who fought in the Battle of
    13·1 answer
  • What defines Anient Chinisr people? What makes them who they are? (unique)
    15·1 answer
  • In the toy industry, Mattel is one of the world leaders, especially with its line of Barbie dolls. However, it has faced competi
    5·1 answer
  • What is an example of when you had to solve a complex problem, and needed to go to multiple sources to resolve.
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes consensus historiography?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!