Answer:
Company A's price per share is $45
Explanation:
The P/E ratio of one company can be used by investors and analysts to determine the value of another companie's stock in the industry. This is called apples-to-apples comparism.
The P/E ratio is used to value a company by comparing its share price to earnings per share.
P/E ratio= market value of shares/ earnings per share
For company B
P/E ratio= 30/2= $15
Using company B's P/E ratio as a benchmark for company A
15= Price per share /3
Price per share = 15*3= $45
Answer:
= 18.7%
Explanation:
<em>A portfolio is a collection of assets/ investment. The return on a portfolio is the weighted average of all the return of the individual assets weighted according to the percentage of total funds allocated to each assets.</em>
Expected return on portfolio:
E(R) =( Wa*Ra) + (Wb*Rb)
Wa = 56% , Wb = 100-56 = 44%
Ra = 12%, Rb = 24%
E(R) = (0.56*24%) + (0.44× 12%)
= 18.7%
Answer:
b. social benefits will be greater than private benefits
Explanation:
Positive externalities can be defined as those that produce positive effects for society in relation to the consumption of a good or service.
This is because the social benefit is the sum of the private benefit plus the sum of the external benefit.
An example of positive externality pertinent to the present is the fact that vaccinating people generates greater positive effects on society, because when vaccinating an individual there is less chance of having more people infected with some disease.
So it is correct to say that the social benefits will be greater than the private ones. Letter b.
Answer:$27.78
Explanation:
Expected value of debt after one year = (40* .60)+(15*.40)
= 24 + 6
=$ 30
Current value of debt = Value at 1year / (1+r)^n
= 30/ (1+.08)^1
= 30 / 1.08
=$ 27.78
Answer:
Follows are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
Yeah, throughout the state court they will ever sue against fraud. As base with the that State is appropriate so because the main place of work is specific budget inventory representatives Inc.
In point b:
Thomas couldn't sue for cheating at the federal court successfully, because equality in nationality would be the only conceivable way. Because as a federal problem also isn't involved, Thomas and both are comprehensive residents of Michigan weren’t diverse for this situation. The business is a resident of all its corporate headquarters and the State of formation.
In point c:
Throughout this situation, silver can claim nationality plurality, as Oklahoma's comprehensive would not be a citizen. It simple company does company in such a state doesn't render that business a citizen. However, if silver has been damaged in terms of $75,000, this failure combined with citizenship diversity would allow it to sue extensively in a federal court. This event does not tell everyone how slowly he lost, however, the facts weren't enough to make a correct judgment.
