Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
The scenario you described suggests that the Law of Demand is correct.
Increase in price will always lead to loss of demand, while replacements for that product will grow in demand.
Answer:
This is the complete question with options
Alex sees that his neighbors' lawns all need mowing. He offers to provide the service in exchange for a wage of $20 per hour. Some neighbors accept Alex's offer and others refuse. Economists would describe Alex's behavior as
A. rational self-interest because he is attempting to increase his own income by identifying and satisfying someone else's wants.
B. greedy because he is asking for a high wage that some of his neighbors can't afford to pay.
C. selfish because he is asking for a wage that is higher than others might charge.
D. irrational because some neighbors refused his offer.
The answer is A . rational self-interest because he is attempting to increase his own income by identifying and satisfying someone else's wants.
Explanation:
Alex is regarded as a rational self - interest individual because his decision focuses on his own monetary benefits which also influences the environment in which he is, in the sense that he is helping his neighbor mow their lawns.
Answer:
since citrus is acidic it cooks the fish making it safe to eat
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Firm A’s worth as a stand-alone entity = $27,000
Firm B’s worth as a stand-alone entity = $12,000
But if Firm A acquired Firm B it’s increase worth of Firm B at $18000.
Firm A is acquired Firm B, this acquisition create value of
= $18,000 - $12000
= $6000.
With this acquisition equity holders of Firms received $18,000 which is $6,000 more than Firm B stand alone.