Answer:
Yes, it would be statistically significant
Step-by-step explanation:
The information given are;
The percentage of jawbreakers it produces that weigh more than 0.4 ounces = 60%
Number of jawbreakers in the sample, n = 800
The mean proportion of jawbreakers that weigh more than 0.4 = 60% = 0.6 = =p
The formula for the standard deviation of a proportion is
Solving for the standard deviation gives;
Given that the mean proportion is 0.6, the expected value of jawbreakers that weigh more than 0.4 in the sample of 800 = 800*0.6 = 480
For statistical significance the difference from the mean = 2× = 2*0.0173 = 0.0346 the equivalent number of Jaw breakers = 800*0.0346 = 27.7
The z-score of 494 jawbreakers is given as follows;
Therefore, the z-score more than 2 × which is significant.
Answer:
A. $3,400
B. $36,600
paying, you mean?
"have after playing his income tax?"
Step-by-step explanation:
A. Simply do $40,000 divided by 8.5, I think.. I used a calculator.
B. Around $36,600 because 40000 minus the income tax amount is $36,600
Answer:
1= 36
2= 6
3= 42
4= 162
5= 200
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Im doing it right now one second
Step-by-step explanation:
Relection ( it was relected over the y axis )
Translation ( it was slide one unit down )