Answer:
A
Explanation:
Element A has 3 electrons in outermost shell so its valency is 3. It will loose 3 electrons to attain stability, as loss of 3 electrons is easier than gain of 5 electrons.
Valency of B is −2 as it will gain 2 electrons to attain stability and combine with other atom.
Valency of A⟶+3
Valency of B⟶−2
(Refer to Image)
Cross multiply valency of A and B
∴A2B3 compound will be formed.
Answer: The molarity of this solution is 0.159 M.
Explanation:
Given: Mass of solute = 16.3 g
Volume = 1.75 L
Number of moles is defined as the mass of substance divided by its molar mass.
Hence, moles of NaCl (molar mass = 58.44 g/mol) ar calculated as follows.
Molarity is the number of moles of a substance present in a liter of solution.
So, molarity of the given solution is calculated as follows.
Thus, we can conclude that the molarity of this solution is 0.159 M.
CO because it is the chemical symbol for the element cobalt whereas the rest are compound. H20 is water, CO2 is carbon dioxide and N2 is dinitrogen.
Answer:
When the results of a new experiment to test atomic theory do not agree with the theory, scientist will repeat the experiment to make sure that his results are reliable.
Explanation:
In the scientific context, each new experiment must be performed with precision and following the steps of the scientific method.
An experiment that does not provide reliable data to demonstrate a theory must be reviewed in detail and performed again to confirm the data obtained in the first attempt.
A theory is a postulate that tries to explain a natural phenomenon, but whose argument can be discussed or does not have the acceptance of a law. When the theory is proven and there are no arguments against it, it can be universally accepted and becomes a law.
The other options are not valid due to:
- <u><em>Scientists worldwide will reject atomic theory because of the new results</em></u><em>. A theory cannot be discarded without solid arguments or evidence in order to dismiss it and establish a new one.</em>
- <u><em>The scientist will change his results to agree with the accepted theory</em></u><em>. This would be an unethical procedure and unacceptable to the scientific community.</em>
- <em><u>Other scientists will reject the results because they do not agree with the theory</u></em><em>. The opinion of other scientists is not enough to dismiss a theory, if it has a valid scientific basis.</em>
