if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
All real numbers
Let's find the critical points of the inequality.
−4x+7=17
−4x+7+−7=17+−7(Add -7 to both sides)
−4x=10
−4x−1=10−1
(Divide both sides by -1)
4x=−10
4x=−10(Solve Exponent)
log(4x)=log(−10)(Take log of both sides)
x*(log(4))=log(−10)
x=log(−10)log(4)
x=NaN
First, we need to know the smallest two digit prime number. It can't start with one, since one is not prime, so it must start with two (or be in the twenties.) 20 is divisible by 2, 4, 5, and 10, 21 is divisible by 7 and 3, 22 is divisible by 2 and 11, so the smallest prime number is 23.
Now we need the largest two-digit prime number. It cannot start with nine or eight, since both are composite, so it must start with seven (be in the seventies.) 79 is the largest integer in the seventies and also happens to be prime, so there's our largest two digit prime number.
now we just need to add them for the sum:
23+79=102
hope I helped, and let me know if you have any questions :D
