Answer:
D. They wanted to give more power to the state governments.
Explanation:
Federalists were people who supported the constitution as is where as people who were against the constitution came to be known as the anti-federalists.
The anti-federalists wanted a bill of rights included in the constitution because they did not trust the government. They were against the the federal government to be stronger than the state government. They wanted the state government to be the strongest and therefore, to protect their rights and safeguarding themselves, they asked for the inclusion of bill of rights.
Answer:
B.interior
Explanation:
because that's is where is locate
<span>A philosopher who only recognizes material existence (not mental or spiritual) could most accurately be called a somatist. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. The other choices can be neglected. I hope that this is the answer that has actually helped you.</span>
Answer:
When a person is asked a question about a political issue that he or she has little interest in and has not thought much about, that person's answer will likely reflect latent preferences.
Explanation:
The opinions that people have on topics that do not interest them are called latent preferences, so these opinions are not too strong or definitive, nor are these people willing to defend them at all costs. For example, a latent preference may be the choice of an NFL team of a person who does not like football.
Answer:
Option D: “Presents an incident in which a military order supported a Muslim traveler”. True.
Explanation:
According to the first paragraph, at the Crusades time Muslims were the principal enemy for Templars, Hospitallers and Knights alike. The second paragraph is a single, personal experience, very rare given that the protagonist is Muslim and only because he had friends within the Templars, he was allowed to pray according to his beliefs. Following the first paragraph, any other Muslim would not have had that special treatment the second writer had.