Answer:
t = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
13 + t = 17
t = 4
13 + 4 = 17
An easier way to solve a question like this is to subtract the number given by the answer.
Example:
17 - 13 = 4
Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
Answer:
60
Step-by-step explanation:
12x5 is equal to 60
Answer: -4
Step-by-step explanation:
2(-3)*2-(-3)+5= -4
D
the answer is D. dilation cannot be used to prove this
