Answer:
(a) rate = -(1/3) Δ[O₂]/Δt = +(1/2) Δ[O₃]/Δt
(b) Δ[O₃]/Δt = 1.07x10⁻⁵ mol/Ls
Explanation:
By definition, t<u>he reaction rate for a chemical reaction can be expressed by the decrease in the concentration of reactants or the increase in the concentration of products:</u>
aX → bY (1)
![rate= -\frac{1}{a} \frac{\Delta[X]}{ \Delta t} = +\frac{1}{b} \frac{\Delta[Y]}{ \Delta t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20rate%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Ba%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%5BX%5D%7D%7B%20%5CDelta%20t%7D%20%3D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bb%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%5BY%5D%7D%7B%20%5CDelta%20t%7D%20)
<em>where, a and b are the coefficients of de reactant X and product Y, respectively. </em>
(a) Based on the definition above, we can express the rate of reaction (2) as follows:
3O₂(g) → 2O₃(g) (2)
(3)
(b) From the rate of disappearance of O₂ in equation (3), we can find the rate of appearance of O₃:
![rate = +\frac{1}{2} \frac{\Delta[O_{3}]}{ \Delta t} = -\frac{1}{3} \frac{\Delta[O_{2}]}{ \Delta t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20rate%20%3D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D%7D%7B%20%5CDelta%20t%7D%20%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%5BO_%7B2%7D%5D%7D%7B%20%5CDelta%20t%7D%20)
![\frac{\Delta[O_{3}]}{ \Delta t} = 1.07 \cdot 10^{-5} \frac{mol}{Ls}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D%7D%7B%20%5CDelta%20t%7D%20%3D%201.07%20%5Ccdot%2010%5E%7B-5%7D%20%5Cfrac%7Bmol%7D%7BLs%7D%20)
So the rate of appearance of O₃ is 1.07x10⁻⁵ mol/Ls.
Have a nice day!
The process of heat transfer by conduction would not work in space:)
This is a benefit I’m not sure if a negative
This strong current of warm water influences the climate of the east coast of Florida, keeping temperatures there warmer in the winter and cooler in the summer than the other southeastern states. Since the Gulf Stream also extends toward Europe, it warms western European countries as well.