Please answer quick

Qing was upset about meeting with the lawyers. They could see risks everywhere and were very good at arguing their position. She

Paraphin [41]

Answer:

C. Beneficial

Explanation:

As Qing was upset about meeting with the lawyers where they could see risks everywhere and were very good at arguing their position. She strongly believed in her proposal. But after a long meeting, Qing and the lawyers worked out new contract language addressing each risk that they identified. In the end, the conflict was beneficial because both parties reached to some productive conclusion at the end and it was win-win situation for both parties. This conflict encouraged both parties in coming up with a solution on which both partied happily agreed as well and hence this conflict was proved fruitful.

7 0

4 years ago

Describe how each of these accounts would appear after the following:______a) A cash dividend of $1 per shareb)10 percent stock

mamaluj [8]

Answer:

the stock will spilt

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Pam has a $36,700 basis (including her share of debt) in her 50 percent partnership interest in the Meddoc Partnership before re

Fantom [35]

Answer:

A.$9,200

B.$40,500

C.$5,400

Explanation:

a. land encumbered with a $18,400 mortgage ×50% =$9,200

Hence:

Mortgage $18,400

Less $9,200

Balance $9,200

Therefore Pam must often try to put into consideration the effects of changes in debt before determining the distribution

effects.

Pam is treated as making a net contribution of cash to the partnership of $9,200, the difference between the full mortgage of $18,400 and her allocated share of the debt of $9,200. This deemed contribution thus increases Pam’s basis in Meddoc from $36,700 to $45,900 which makes Pam not to recognize any gain or loss on the current distribution.

b.Pam takes a carryover basis in the land equal to $40,500.

c.Pam’s outside basis in the partnership after the distribution is as follows:

Basis in Meddoc $36,700

Plus: Deemed contribution $9,200

Less: Land(40,500)

Remaining basis in Meddoc $5,400

7 0

3 years ago

Company X purchased Company Y using financing as follows: $18 million from mortgages, $3 million from retained earnings, $13 mil

ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

The debt to equity mix = 74.65% - 25.35%

Explanation:

The computation of the debt to equity mix is shown below:

Debt is

= Mortgages + Bond

= $18 + $35

= $53 million

And, the Equity is

= Retained earnings + Cash in hand

= $5 + $13

= $18 million

Now

Percentage of debt financing

= $53 ÷ ($53 + $18)

= 74.65%

And, percentage of equity financing is

= $18 ÷ ($53 + $18)

= 25.35%

And, finally

The debt to equity mix = 74.65% - 25.35%

3 0

3 years ago

Your firm is contemplating the purchase of a new $684,500 computer-based order entry system. The system will be depreciated stra

liraira [26]

Answer:

total pretax annual savings = $210,941.06

Explanation:

initial outlay (year 0) = -$684,500 (cost of computer system) + $92,500 (reduction of net working capital) = -$592,000

depreciation expense per year = $684,500 / 5 = $136,900

net after tax cash value = $66,600 x (1 - 21%) = $52,614

net cash flows years 1 - 4 = [($203,750 - $136,900) x 79%] + $136,900 = $189,711.50

net cash flow year 5 = $189,711.50 + $52,614 = $242,325.50

using a 21% discount rate, the NPV = -$16,622.15

Since the NPV is negative, that means that the annual cost savings are not high enough to accept the project.

the point where the company would be indifferent between accepting or rejecting the project is when NPV = 0

this means that net cash flows must increase by $16,622.15 / 2.92595 (PV annuity factor, 21%, 5 periods) = $5,680.94

this is an after tax number, but a pretax annual cost saving = $5,608.94 / 0.79 = $7,191.06

total pretax annual savings = $203,750 + $7,191.06 = $210,941.06

net cash flows years 1 - 4 = [($210,941.06 - $136,900) x 79%] + $136,900 = $195,392.44

net cash flow year 5 = $195,392.44 + $52,614 = $248,006.44

NPV = 0

3 0

4 years ago