Answer:
A. only II
Step-by-step explanation:
Mathematics calculus differentiates things into discrete and continuous. Discrete things have indivisible units, the example will be how many dogs in a village. There is no half dog, it's either one, two, etc. But the distance covered by train can be written as half miles, it's divisible unit.
The number of books and bracelets also discrete, thus the answer is A.
Answer: a
reason:
if you take any of the numbers and plug it in it works
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
1.
- 3(x+3) - 2 < 4
- 3x + 9 -2 < 4
- 3x < 4-7
- 3x < - 3
- x < -1
- x = (-oo, -1)
2.
- 1 - x ≤ -1
- - x ≤ -1 - 1
- -x ≤ -2
- x ≥ 2
- x = [2, +oo)
Correct choice is B.
3x-y=6, in order to be able to graph this you would have to change the equation to y=, so you need to subtract 3x from that side making it -y=-3x+6, now you need to y positive, so divide both sides by -1, thus making the equation look like y=3x-6, now if you can't plug this into a calculator to see what it would look like then you need to know what y=mx+b means. y is the equation you want to graph obviously, m = the slope, so our slope in this case would be -3, and b = our y intercept, so it would be (0,-6), so plot (0,-6) and use the slope to plot the rest of the points, some other points in this line should include (2,0), (-1,-9) and (4,6), just to name a few. Hope this helps.
Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
