This is an illustration of correlation without causation.
Explanation:
For Example:
The inspectors who are poorly informed calculate shoe size and decipher comprehension. You note that both are linked favourably. Their report claiming smaller feet lead to better reading skills is, of course, denied. Given the connection between the two, foot size does not affect better reading abilities.
First of all, age estimation is related both to the foot size and comprehension of the reading. The another missing element is a philosophical and analytical model that can be used to explain the causal relationships from age to foot and from age to understanding through reading. Older existence is associated with both and because we have a rational conceptual model for human experiences which is in line with such an explanation, we assume it is the origin of both.
Answer:
C. Liabilities
Explanation:
Financial accounting can be defined as the field of accounting involving specific processes such as recording, summarizing, analysis and reporting of financial transactions with respect to business operations over a specific period of time.
Owner's equity is simply what a person owns outrightly and it is also referred to as net worth. It can be defined as the value of financial and non-financial assets owned by a person minus the total outstanding liabilities or debts of that person. Simply stated, owner's equity refers to the difference between the amount a person own (asset) and the amount owed (liability).
Mathematically, net worth is given by the formula;
Making liabilities the subject of formula, we have;
In Financial accounting, liability can be defined as the amount of money being owed by an individual or organization to another.
Simply stated, liability is a debt being owed and as such it usually has "payable" in its account title on the balance sheet.
Generally, liabilities are recorded on the right side of the balance sheet and it comprises of financial informations such as warranties, bonds, loans, deferred revenues, mortgages, account payable etc.
Hence, Assets minus Owner's Equity is equal to Liabilities.
Answer:
Comment for statement A - The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
Comment for statement B - There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Explanation:
a)
“I like the IRR rule. I can use it to rank projects without having to specify a discount rate”
The firm must still compare the IRR with the opportunity cost of capital when using the IRR rule. Therefore, even with the IRR method, the appropriate discount rate must still be specified.
b.
“I like the payback rule. As long as the minimum payback period is short, the rule makes sure that the company takes no borderline projects. That reduces risk”
There should be a higher discount rate on risky cash flows than the rate used to discount less risky cash flows.
Making use of the payback rule is equivalent to using the NPV rule with a zero discount rate for cash flows before the payback period and an infinite discount rate for cash flows thereafter.
Answer:
Following is the solution for the given problem.
Explanation:
Best order size, EOQ =√2DS/H
EOQ = √2*4700*60/5
EOQ = 336 units.
D = 4700/300 = 15.66.
σ L= √∑σ²
= √3*(5)² = 8.66.
Reorder point, R = D*L+ z σ L
Reorder point, R = 15.66*3 + 1.282*8.66
Reorder point, R = 58 units.
Answer:
The answer is D). 1.15, hope this helps, have a great day/night, stay safe, happy thanksgiving!
