Trapezoidal Prism
It is a prism with 2 bases of shape trapezoid
Answer:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since repetition isn't allowed, there would be
choices for the first donut,
choices for the second donut, and
choices for the third donut. If the order in which donuts are placed in the bag matters, there would be
unique ways to choose a bag of these donuts.
In practice, donuts in the bag are mixed, and the ordering of donuts doesn't matter. The same way of counting would then count every possible mix of three donuts type
times.
For example, if a bag includes donut of type
,
, and
, the count
would include the following
arrangements:
Thus, when the order of donuts in the bag doesn't matter, it would be necessary to divide the count
by
to find the actual number of donut combinations:
.
Using combinatorics notations, the answer to this question is the same as the number of ways to choose an unordered set of
objects from a set of
distinct objects:
.
Answer:
180cm3
Step-by-step explanation:
4x12x3=144
2x2x9=36
144+36=180cm3
Answer:
Exactly 16%.
Step-by-step explanation:
Normal Probability Distribution
Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean
and standard deviation
, the z-score of a measure X is given by:
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
The mean of a certain set of measurements is 27 with a standard deviation of 14.
This means that 
The proportion of measurements that is less than 13 is
This is the p-value of Z when X = 13, so:

has a p-value of 0.16, and thus, the probability is: Exactly 16%.
Answer:
1000, 2000, 3000, .... etc are the 4-digit numbers which when divided by 1000, give whole number answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Scott divides some 4- digit numbers by 1000 and his answer is a decimal every time.
From this Scott has concluded that if you divide a 4-digit number by 1000, then the answer will never be a whole number.
I think Scott is wrong and the reason is that if we try to divide those 4-digit numbers which are multiples of 1000, i.e. 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, ... etc. with 1000 then only you will get a whole number answer. (Answer)