Which best describes how a proxy war differs from a traditional war?

Social Studies

2 answers:

Contact [7]4 years ago

6 0

B]the opposing powers in a proxy war use others to fight on their behalf

larisa [96]4 years ago

6 0

Answer: B) The opposing powers in a proxy war use others to fight on their behalf.

A proxy war is one in which the opposing parties that are fighting are in fact acting on the instigation or on behalf of other parties that are not directly involved in the hostilities. This usually takes the form of funding, military training, arms of other types of material assistance. Proxy wars were common during the Cold War, as they were seen as a safer alternative to direct conflict between the Soviet Union and the United States. It is not always easy to establish which wars can be considered proxy wars, but some common examples include the Angolan Civil War, the Nicaraguan Revolution and the Vietnam War.

You might be interested in

A person Who opposed the Constitution and favored addition of the bill of rights was called

alexandr402 [8]

Answer:

Anti-Federalists

Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists were opposed to the ratification of the Constitution unless the Bill of Rights was added to protect their individual rights.

7 0

3 years ago

Which claim is arguable? A. There are more Democrats than Republicans in Congress. B. Senators should not have term limits. C. T

fgiga [73]

Answer:

The claim that is arguable is B: Senators should not have term limits.

Explanation:

I chose B because it is the only claim that contains a personal opinion. All the others are facts: there are more Democrats that Republicans in Congress, the Constitution divides powers between the federal government and state governments, and the United States has 50 states. All of these are facts, but the second one (B) is a personal opinion, and we realize that when reading the word should, therefore is arguable because another person might have a different opinion about the same subject.

4 0

3 years ago

Dentify your country, its type of government, and the parts of its government.

lions [1.4K]

Answer:

the country is north america

Explanation:

i have none

7 0

3 years ago

A belief outcome of people’s lives are planned in advance by God.

iren [92.7K]

Answer:

It should be predestination

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose Briscoe Cole is found not guilty of murder in a fair jury trial. Later, evidence comes to light that Briscoe may have be

Effectus [21]

If Briscoe was found not guilty in a fair jury trial and evidence came to light that could of made him guilt, he can't be charged again. Under the double jeopardy principle of the Fifth Amendment, Briscoe can't be tried again for that same crime. The correct answer is A.

8 0

3 years ago