Um, prostitution? Is this an actual question?
When burning, Yes.
A normal fire in a steel-frame building can soften the structure to the point of collapse.
Building laws / regulations require that all the structural steelwork is either covered in a protective coating (such as intumescent paint) or boxed in with fire-resistant plaster, so the fire can be extinguished before the building is weakened - or at least give people time to get out.
If that coating or plaster is damaged by impact or an explosion, the steel is exposed and the building can collapse relatively quickly.
(The common intumescent coatings just look like paint until exposed to fire, so the steelwork may appear to have no particular protection - but it always does).
Information:
http://www.steelconstruction.info/Fire_p...
See the images below - small buildings with steel-frame roofs after fires; you can see the amount of "sagging" and distortion on structures that have no particularly high loads.
These have burned long enough to destroy any protection, or they did not have any as the structure does not support occupied space.
http://www.champnews.com/Picture_Library...
http://thelincolnite.co.uk/wp-content/up...
The best answer that fits the blank provided is option D. Based on the U.S Supreme Court, they can only rule on a constitutional issue given that the decision made should be final unless overturned by a constitutional amendment or a new decision of the court. Hope this helps.
Group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercises power but remains constitutionally responsible to the public non-democratic.
a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
- This section first explains why a more thorough typology is required rather than a simple binary classification before outlining various nondemocratic regime types. Although it does not attempt to assess the relative efficacy of each type of regime discussed—doing so would necessitate a book unto itself—it does conclude with a sobering reminder of the numerous atrocities done by nondemocratic regimes that should never be overlooked.
- The goal of legitimization is to win the populace's active permission, compliance with the regime's regulations, passive obedience, toleration, or resignation. Legitimation presents at least two significant obstacles for the study of non-democratic regimes. The first criticism is that legitimation is only "window decoration." Accordingly, the autocracies' attempts to legitimize themselves lack substance since they are merely outward manifestations of the violence, coercion, or co-optation the regime is able to wield. Second, it is frequently asserted that the conceptual and methodological challenges involved in its analysis are insurmountable, even though it is widely acknowledged that legitimation is crucial to the continuation of non-democratic government. Understanding the goals, motivations, and consequences of non-democratic regimes makes these obstacles crucial to overcome Having stable legitimacy can shed light on several facets of autocratic rule.
To learn more about nondemocratic visit:brainly.com/question/474018
#SPJ4
