The adversarial system or adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly.[1][2][3] It is in contrast to the inquisitorial system used in some civil law systems (i.e. those deriving from Roman law or the Napoleonic code) where a judge investigates the case.
The adversarial system is the two-sided structure under which criminal trial courts operate, putting the prosecution against the defense.
<h2><em><u>please</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mark</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>in</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>brain</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>list</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2>
Answer:
Evaluation of alternatives
Explanation:
in this step, consumer narrow down choices deciding on feasibility, and comparing the pros and cons of each remaining option.
Answer:
Untouchability is the practice of excluding a group by segregating them from the mainstream by social or legal mandate this is wrong because all people should be treated fairly.
Explanation:
Because consumers behave in a rationally self-interested manner, the consumer will purchase a good or service when the marginal benefit is greater than or equal to the marginal cost.
<h3>
When you make a choice in your self-interest?</h3>
- Congestion: A commuter driving to work has no incentive to consider the cost of his actions on other drivers in the form of increased traffic congestion.
- The well-being of society For instance, there are several potential solutions to traffic congestion
- Individual driver gasoline sales are taxed.
learn more about transportation refer:
brainly.com/question/24925498
#SPJ4
