Answer:(2,0) x=2,y=0
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's solve your system by elimination.
−x+y=−2;2x−3y=4
Multiply the first equation by 2,and multiply the second equation by 1.
2(−x+y=−2)
1(2x−3y=4)
Becomes:
−2x+2y=−4
2x−3y=4
Add these equations to eliminate x:
−y=0
Then solve−y=0 for y:
−y=0
−y/−1 =0/−1
(Divide both sides by -1)
y=0
Now that we've found y let's plug it back in to solve for x.
Write down an original equation:
−x+y=−2
Substitute0foryin−x+y=−2:
−x+0=−2
−x=−2(Simplify both sides of the equation)
−x/−1 = −2/−1
(Divide both sides by -1)
x=2
 
        
             
        
        
        
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let 
 be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and 
 be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
                          Cars                     Trucks                         Total
Total                  2049                    334                             2383
x                          239                      45                                284
p                        0.1166                   0.1347                          0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be  :


It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
        
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so  we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4
 
        
             
        
        
        
C and the vertex is V (6,18)
        
             
        
        
        
The sum of the areas would be two small squares so no
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If two lines are cut by a transversal so that any pair of alternate interior angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel. If two lines are cut by a transversal so that any pair of corresponding angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel. You can use these converses to decide whether two lines are parallel.