Why did Jackson fight the battle of New Orleans?

Social Studies

1 answer:

faust18 [17]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Major General Andrew Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans for a number of reasons. First is that neither the British not Jackson and his men had heard that the two warring sides had already signed a treaty to end the hostilities in Ghent, Belgium on December 24th, 1814. Also, Jackson had been a prisoner of the British during the American Revolution and he was said to still hold a lot of personal animosity towards them for that reason.

Explanation:

Jackson had declared martial law in New Orleans and called on anyone and everyone to try to defend the city from the British incursion. Skirmishes began on Dec 23rd, 1814 and culminated in the Battle of New Orleans on the 8th of January, 1815. The American group of militia fighters and whomever else was prepared to defend the city were able to outwit the British who suffered many casualties despite the upper hand they had in terms of tactics and equipment.

You might be interested in

Question 10 unsavedwhy do we study shakespeare today?question 10 options:because he wrote about lifebecause he was popular in hi

tamaranim1 [39]

Because his plays was poetic

7 0

3 years ago

How many significant figures does this number contain?<br> 80

weeeeeb [17]

Answer:

It's has one significant figures

Explanation:

Because in significant figures zero isn't considered as a number

8 0

3 years ago

Evaluate the purpose and effectiveness of United States aid around the world.

inysia [295]

Foreign aid can involve a transfer of financial resources or commodities or technical advice and training. Most common aid is ODA... official development assistance to help combat poverty

6 0

3 years ago

Punan ang tsart ng mga datos na naging resulta ng pag lawak ng rome

marusya05 [52]

Answer:

what are you saying i can't understand ???

4 0

2 years ago

When a court finds that the shareholders of a corporation are using the corporate structure to shield themselves from liability

Burka [1]

The correct answer would be, Piercing the Corporate Veil.

The court may disregard the corporate structure and impose personal liability on the shareholders treating them like partners. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.

Explanation:

A corporation is a form of business in which there are officers called as the board of directors, who run the business as a separate legal entity.

There are shareholders in the corporation who have their shares or stakes in the company.

When a court finds that the shareholders of a corporation are using corporate structure as a shield from liability when acting purely for personal purposes, then in this situation, the court holds the shareholders and directors, personally liable for their actions and debts. This is called as Piercing the Corporate Veil.

Learn more about Piercing the Corporate Veil at:

brainly.com/question/13800014

#LearnWithBrainly

7 0

2 years ago