Group of answer choices.
A. Is not warm enough to the applicants.
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
C. Does not give applicants enough information, leaving them with more questions than answers.
D. Comes off as being too professional for someone in the HR field.
E. Is not approaching the candidate with enough skepticism.
Answer:
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
In this scenario, Maria is well respected among her peers for her professional standards and understanding of the HR field. She noticed that when she recruits engineers for her company, they sometimes seem unresponsive to her. Thus, the most likely reason for this is because Maria is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist and as such is considered not to have a deep understanding of the field of engineering to recruit a qualified and experienced candidate.
Answer: (D) Application of ethics to business situations
Explanation:
The applications of the business ethics is one of the form of professional ethics in an organization that helps in examine the overall ethical principle and also the moral problems in the environment.
It also helps in governing the actions during the decision making process and also manage the behavior of the person in an organization.
It is also refers to the unwritten principle and the values in an organization that helps managing the company. According to the given question, the application of the business ethics situation is basically encountered by the ethical maturity model.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct answer.
How to calculate Open-to-buy:
Open-to-buy = planned purchases - (orders received + merchandise ordered)
Planned purchases = $2,500
Received orders = $1,200
Ordered merchandise = $700
Open-to-buy = $2,500 - ($1,200 + $700)
Open-to-buy = $2,500 - $1,900
Open-to-buy = $600
Answer:
5.657%
Explanation:
Data provided:
Face value = $1,000
Current market price = $640
Time of maturity, t = 8 year
Now,
the compounding formula is given as:
Face value = Current amount × 
where,
r is the rate i.e pretax rate of debt
n is the number of times the interest is compounded i.e for semiannual n = 2
thus, on substituting the values, we get
$ 1,000= $ 640 × 
or
1.5625 = 
or
= 1.0282
or
r = 0.05657
or
pretax cost of debt = 0.05657 × 100% = 5.657%
Answer:
Yes, the contract is still valid.
Explanation:
Let us first clarify some terms first.
A contract is referred to as a legally binding agreement that is recognized, known and governs the rights and duties of the parties involved in an agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the features and approval of the law. An agreement basically involves the exchange of goods, transactions, services, money, or promises. In the case of breach of contract, the law awards the injured party access to legal remedies which include damages and cancellation.
Letter of revocation is an act by which a person having authority, calls back or in other words annuls a power, gift, or benefit, which had been bestowed upon another.
Yes, the contract still holds. This is due to the reason that the letter had a date mentioned on it which is August 4, a day before the contract was accepted even though the revocation letter arrived late.
Therefore, as regards to the date on the letter, the contract is still valid.
