Answer:
Yes.
Alexander is an intended third party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales.
Explanation:
In the law of contracts, Alexander becomes a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales, and he has the right to sue in the contract notwithstanding that he was not an active party to the contract. Some of the factors that may be present to show that a Alexander is an intended beneficiary are: (1) the contract's performance is rendered directly to Alexander; (2) Alexander has rights to control the details of the performance; or (3) there is an express designation in the contract, e.g. the title to the car is in Alexander's name.
A system has two processes and three identical resources. each process needs a maximum of two resources.---<u> Deadlock is not possible</u>.
<h3>What's deadlock explain?</h3>
A deadlock is a situation in which two computer programs participating the same resource are effectively precluding each other from penetrating the resource, performing in both programs ending to serve. The foremost computer operating systems ran only one program at a time.
<h3>What happens in deadlock?</h3>
Deadlock is a situation where a set of processes are blocked because each process is holding a resource and staying for another resource acquired by some other process
Learn more about deadlock:
brainly.com/question/25541016
#SPJ4
Jackson motors tells sue, a consumer, that bliss automobiles are made with metal bodies when they are in fact made of fiberglass. This would be considered a fraudulent misrepresentation.
Under contract law, a plaintiff can recover compensatory damages against any defendant when the court finds that the defendant has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation. Courts will find that a defendant has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation when following factors have been met:
a representation was made by the defendant, the representation which was made was false
that when it is made, the defendant knew that the representation made by him was false.
that the fraudulent misrepresentation was made with the intention so that the plaintiff rely on it.
To know more about fraudulent misrepresentation here:
brainly.com/question/13808699
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>medically speaking, Yes!</u>
Explanation:
Since the scenario only <em>involves the individual running into the car, not the car hitting the individual</em>; meaning that he'll have less severe injuries.
To be able to recover from the harm done, the individual may need first aid treated.
