Answer:
Federal Trade Commission
Explanation:
because it has jurisdiction over false advertising
Answer:
The answer is B. The professor's power over the student through grading limits the student's ability to accept or refuse freely.
Explanation:
Although at a first glance of the situation we might think that it is not harrasment because the student has the liberty to accept or refuse, we must look more closely at the situation. Harrasment involves a power relationship, in which the offender stands in a position of power over the victim, in this case, there is a power relationship, one is a professor and the other is a student. The professor has the ability to affect the academic performance of the student and the knowledge of that will affect the student's decision to accept or refuse; therefore, the student can't choose freely.
D. There were middlemen for them, as trading was quite common between the groups.
The answer is certainly A.
Answer:
on Agree on contingencies, monitoring, and evaluation.
Explanation:
<h3><em>
Conditions may change. Make contingency agreements about foreseeable future circumstances (If-then!).
</em></h3><h3><em>
How will you monitor compliance and follow-through?
</em></h3><h3><em>
Create opportunities to evaluate the agreements and their implementation. ("Let's try it this way for three months and then look at it.")
</em></h3><h3><em>
Effective problem solving does take some time and attention more of the latter than the former. But less time and attention than is required by a problem not well solved. What it really takes is a willingness to slow down. A problem is like a curve in the road. Take it right and you'll find yourself in good shape for the straightaway that follows. Take it too fast and you may not be in as good shape.</em></h3>