Answer: All of them seem to apply.
Explanation:
A., Its important to know if your car that is being collided is a small car or big truck, as they will end up effecting who gets hurt the most.
B., Same thing as A. but with the other vehicle.
C., The velocity matters a lot with a collision, since a slow crash won't have as much damage as a car going fast and hitting someone. Also it won't be as likely to be fatal if the car crashing into you is going slow.
D., This is the only one I'm not too sure on, but it seems like how fast the car can accelerate once collided with would be a big factor on whether it would come to a halt or skid across the road.
<span> For a start, when you have a question that needs answering in science, you formulate a null hypothesis. That is a negative statement which you then set out to prove or disprove. This is just a convention. So if your initial question is for example, "Does sugar dissolve in water?"
Your null hypothesis will be "Sugar does not dissolve in water."
You then set up your experiment and get some data.
Now if your data doesn't support your null hypothesis then you reject it and make the statement ,"Sugar does dissolve in water." As you can see from this simple example, a non-result is still a result so the idea of formulating new tests as mentioned by another answerer isn't necessary and in some ways is the incorrect thing to do. In science, hypotheses are often not supported by data and i would argue that this is the case a lot of the time. A non-result is still a result and you will have plenty to write about whichever way it goes. </span>
Answer:
homologous structures.
Explanation:
If two organisms look very similar during their early stages of development, this is evidence that the organisms. evolved from a common ancestor.
Answer:
When the diaphragm contracts (it's a large flat muscle), it pulls the lungs down this causing expansion which eventually lead to inhalation of air. If it's injured, then that will be affected.
