Answer:
Kassandra can u plz mark me as brainliest
becoz I needed it very much
He created the Alien and Sedition Acts. This silenced critics and also made it harder to become a citizen while making it easy to deport French and Irish. eventually he sent another diplomatic Convoy.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The most ideal way to improve the way we are currently responding to people who are practicing different religions, speaking different languages, and upholding different value systems are as follows:
1. Develop mutual respect: when we respect the culture and tradition of people that have so many differences from us, it helps us to relate well and see things from their perspective.
2. Embracing mutual trust and understanding: trusting and trying to understand people of different cultural background helps us to quickly blend in and improve the way we respond to them
3. Having more knowledge of these people: knowing more about the history and socio-cultural background of people who have so many differences from us can assist us to relate and respond to them quickly and respectably.
Answer:
The argument seems logical but...
Explanation:
In population there is not much difference between New Jersey (9 million) and Georgia (10 million) but I guess in average income there is, and quite a big one too.
We also have to take into account that a state that legalizes sports betting will attract many people in the beginning (because of the novelty) and, more to the point, that probably a lot of these people making sports bets are not residents of New Jersey.
A more ethical argument would be to prove that legalizing sports bets is indeed an effective way to stop the ilegal sports betting.
This technique is known as Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a way of having a person to furnish or follow a big request with the aid of using to begin with making small or modest requests.
The approach is primarily based totally at the good judgment that if a respondent (the individual being requested) can furnish an preliminary small or modest request, then the respondent might be maximum probable to later furnish a bigger request that he/she (the respondent) might now no longer have granted if requested outright (with out being approached with small requests first).
To learn more about foot-in-the-door phenomenon, click here:
brainly.com/question/15745551
#SPJ4
