Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's indefinite. Hope this helps!☺️
Answer:
Information.
Explanation:
Information is an important document in criminal proceedings.
Information in criminal justice is an abstract of the formal charges and the laws that have been violated by the criminal and also the evidence that supports the charges.
So all these contents are outlined by the information.
Hence we conclude that the answer to this question is Information.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
b. Interest-group
Explanation:
This group is the actual one due to the fact that, they all work towards actualizing a common goal and agenda of the said group. For example, if the agenda of the group was to see to the establishment of military arm of that countries forces in another smaller country, they will work towards that knowing fully well that, the group will benefit in one way or the other.
Answer: approach - approach conflict
Explanation: Approach - Approach conflict also called multiple approach conflict ensues when an individual has to make a choice between two desirable options. As when an individual has to choose between two cars which are equally appealing.Approach - Approach conflict swings in the aspect of options which are desirable .This is the opposite of avoidance - avoidance conflict where an individual is stuck in between undesirable choices.
In the scenario above, Moya has to choose between her best friend and new boyfriend where both options are cherished by her.
