Answer:
hey love! hope this helps!
On average, there are 16 shark bite incidents per year in the United States with one fatality every two years. Despite these reports, however, the actual number of fatal shark bites worldwide remains uncertain.
Answer:
The total mass of materials present after a chemical reaction is the same as the total mass before the reaction
Explanation:
The Mass Conservation Act or the Conservation Matter Act proposed by Lavoisier postulates that: "The sum of the masses of the reactant substances is equal to the sum of the masses of the reaction products."
To reach these conclusions, Lavoisier used precise scales involving various elements in sealed containers. The total masses of the elements did not vary before (reactants) and after the reaction (products), remaining constant. Note that if he performed his experiments in an open environment there would be a loss of mass as the substance would react with air.
In this case, if we look at an iron that over time reacts with air (resulting in rust), we notice the variation in its initial mass. That is, it becomes larger after contact between them as it has the mass of iron and the mass of air.
Thus, we can state that the law of conservation of mass states states that the total mass of materials present after a chemical reaction is the same as the total mass before the reaction.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A theory for suing for damages caused by products is breach of warranty. This is a contract claim, and the purchaser of the product is claiming that the product failed to perform as warranted.
Answer:
According to the Supreme Ruling of 1988 in the case between <em>California v. Greenwood</em>, it was decided that the 4th amendment to the United States constitution does not permit Law Enforcement Agents to seize or search garbage that a suspect left outside of his or her residence without a warrant.
The court's initial argument was that if an individual put out their garbage outside of their house, and in the public, knowing that anyone and or anything could tamper with or rummage it, then there was no reason for such an individual to expect the Law Enforcement Agents to provide a warrant prior to searching such garbage.
Justice Brennan in a counter-argument stated whilst it was true that anyone could have accessed the garbage without the owner's consent, snooping around such behaviour was not exactly one that was reasonably expected of civilised people.
Cheers
