The republic of south Africa exports edible fruits and nuts into the common market known as the European union, and imports from the European union other products which south Africa could produce but at a higher cost than what it costs the Europeans to produce. this practice follows the theory of comparative advantage.
Comparative gain is an economic system's potential to supply a specific proper or provider at a reduced possibility rate than its buying and selling partners. Comparative benefit is used to provide an reason for why organizations, countries, or people can benefit from trade.
For instance, if a country is skilled at making each cheese and chocolate, they will decide how much tough work is going into producing each right. If it takes one hour of exertions to produce 10 devices of cheese and one in each of of tough paintings to deliver 20 devices of chocolate, then this united states has a comparative benefit in making chocolate.
Comparative advantage, monetary precept, first developed via 19th-century British economist David Ricardo, that attributed the reason and advantages of global alternate to the variations within the relative possibility costs (prices in phrases of other objects given up) of producing the same commodities amongst global locations.
Learn more about Comparative advantage here: brainly.com/question/15361275
#SPJ4
Answer:
$100,000
Explanation:
According to the internal revenue service ''<u>In most situations, the basis of an asset is its cost to you.</u> <u>The cost is the amount you pay for it in cash</u>, debt obligations, and other property or services. Cost includes sales tax and other <u>expenses connected with the purchase</u>.''
Therefore Sebastian's basis in these two assets is unconnected with the fair market value of the assets but with the cost.
Purchased Equipment is always recorded at its acquisition cost or its net book value, that is after deducting the accumulated depreciation
. In the scenario we have no depreciation figures, hence the basis is the cost of $100,000
Matthew decides to buy expensive designer jeans. Less expensive jeans are available, but the added cost of the designer brand is worth it to Matthew most likely because His preference is for designer labels, since the assertions made by the other manufacturers, which claim that designer trousers are less expensive, are illogical. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the cost?</h3>
Generally, payment is required before it can be obtained or completed.
In conclusion, Affluent designer jeans are Matthew's choice. There are cheaper jeans out there, but Matthew most certainly prefers designer labels since the arguments of the other manufacturers, who say that designer pants are less costly, are irrational.
Read more about cost
brainly.com/question/15135554
#SPJ1
