For starters, we know that the angle measures have to be similar or the same, since similar shapes always contain the same angle measures. We can use the way that the letters of each shape line up to identify which angle correspond to each other. Angle R should be congruent to angle W, but angle P is not congruent to N, it would be congruent to M though. Now we get to the tricky part, figuring out line segment lengths. Again using the letters in each shape, we can see that TK and NM do not correspond to each other, and thus cannot be congruent or similar. But, with RP/WM, this is correctly lined up with each other. TR/EW, same with this one, and TK/EN is also the same. With this Info, we can figure out the dilation of the smaller shape, or just figure out if they are similar or not. (So pick B. And D.)
Answer:
what is this russian math?
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula of compound continuously is
A=p e^rt
A future value?
P present value 300
R interest rate 0.07
T 4 years
E constant
A=300×e^(0.07×4)
A=396.94 round your answer to get
A=397
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
As per Janayda,
From the figure attached,
In ΔTRQ,
m∠TRQ + m∠RQT + m∠QTR = 180°
25° + m∠RQT + 35° = 180°
m∠RQT = 180° - 60°
m∠RQT = 120°
Since, m∠RQT + m∠PQT = 180° [Linear pair of angles]
m∠PQT = 180° - m∠RQT
= 180° - 120°
= 60°
In right angled triangle TPQ,
m∠TPQ + m∠PQT + m∠PTQ = 180°
90° + 60° + m∠PTQ = 180°
m∠PTQ = 180° - 150°
= 30°
Similarly, other angles can also be evaluated from the given information.
In ΔQTP and ΔNTP,
TP ≅ TP [Reflexive property]
NP ≅ PQ [Given]
ΔQTP ≅ ΔNTP [By LL postulate for congruence]
Therefore, Janayda is correct.
While Sirr is incorrect.
Since, there is not the enough information to prove ΔRTQ and ΔMTN equal, Isabelle is incorrect.
