Solution :
a). Total debt = notes payable + long term debt
= 145,000 + 750,000
= $ 895,000
b). Total liabilities and equity = total assets
= 2,900,000
c). Current assets = total assets - net plant and equipment
= 2,900,000 - 2,600,000
=$ 300,000
d). Total current liabilities = total liabilities and equity - total common equity - long term debt
= 2,900,000 - 1,550,000 - 750,000
= $ 600,000
e). Accounts payable and accruals = total current liabilities - notes payable
= 600,000 - 145,000
= 455,000
f). Net working capital = current asset - current liabilities
= 300,000 - 600,000
= - $300,000
g). Net operating working capital = current assets - accounts payable and accruals
= 300,000 - 455,000
= - $ 155,000
h). The difference between f) and g). represents the balance of notes payable.
Answer:
Democratic leadership
Explanation:
Democratic leadership defines that the leader motivates his subordinates to come up with suggestions and alternatives for a specific issue. Then, based on the number of votes received from his group members, he chooses the best choice for a specific alternative choice.
Therefore according to the given situation, Chang meets with his whole team who is a specialist team in designing and find out the ideas for which they implement on the project. Designers bring concepts with them and everybody votes. So this style of Chang is called Democratic leadership.
Answer:
The correct option is D,credit to Preferred Stock for $1,600,000 and Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par-Preferred Stock for $320,000
Explanation:
The total par value of the preferred stock issue is $100 multiplied by 16,000 which gives $1,600,000 while the remaining $20 per share multiplied by 16,000 that gave rise $320,000 goes to the credit of paid-in capital in excess of par-preferred stock account.
Option A is wrong because the preferred has a par value of $100 hence the total cash proceeds cannot be posted to preferred stock account alone.
Option B is wrong because the excess of $20 per share cannot be posted to retained earnings since it is net income
If Joe has good morals he would stop and help the women. He could have the money taken out of his pay check to possible keep his job but if he does not stop and help the women he will have live with his decision for the rest of his life, the guilt would eat him alive. He can always get another job but we only have one life to live and if he could help save someone else, he should do that.
