The answer is social comparison. This states that we decide our own social and individual worth in view of how we stack up against others we see as by one means or another faring better or more regrettable. We now and again contrast ourselves with others as a method for cultivating self-change, self-inspiration, and a positive mental self portrait.
The Jews suffered and yes afterwards the Jews were better than before
Answer:
Appreciating Mark's work in the presence of his classmates.
Explanation:
The first one is not a positive reinforcement lol- that would make him embarrassed and he would most likely start to blame himself and lose motivation making the situation more difficult..
Third one- detaining him wont do anything for that situation unless hes talking about ways to help him improve on getting in work on in time.
The last one will make him feel good about himself and will make him want to do better including enhancing his slight mistakes- such as being late. Seems like the only reasonable answer. :)
The following situation would be an example of freedom of association:
C.) Homeowners in a local neighborhood deciding to schedule monthly potluck dinners.
Freedom of association is a voluntary informal gathering wherein one can choose to come and go as they please.
I.) Parliamentary
Head of state is mainly ceremonial.
Chief executive can be forced out by "no confidence" vote.
Chief executive is chosen by the legislature.
Head of state has very long or life term of office.
The executive and legislative branches are jointly controlled by a ruling party or coalition.
II.) Presidential
Checks and balances hold between the executive and the legislative branches.
Chief executive is elected by the people.
Head of state is chief executive.
