Briefly summarize the case Roe v. Wade and explain whether it represents an example of judicial restraint or judicial activism.

1 answer:

5 0

The case<em> Roe vs. Wade in 1973</em> was one when the Supreme Court authorized woman's legal right to abortion. Judges voted the decision 7-2 with the argument that the woman's right to abortion was protected by the privacy rights of the Constitution Fourteenth Amendment.

This represented an example of<em> judicial activism</em> where the judges considered to decide constitutional issues and to invalidate execution actions.

You might be interested in

In early American families, who did the majority of the work in the family?

olga nikolaevna [1]

The mother family was doing majority of the work

5 0

2 years ago

Aidan is a college student. As part of his economics project, he has to collect data on the consumption patterns of the househol

dalvyx [7]

Answer:

Microeconomics

Explanation:

Microeconomics is the study of decisions made by people and businesses regarding the allocation of resources and prices of goods and services. It also takes into account taxes, regulations, and government legislation.

Microeconomics main focus is on the supply and demand and other forces that determine the price levels in the economy. Microeconomics main purpose is to understand human choices, decisions, and the allocation of resources

7 0

2 years ago

Describe the role of ancestry in the traditional religion of Ghana

torisob [31]

The answer to item above is: The role of ancestry in the traditional religion of Ghana is to make sure that the families remain bonded and loyal to each other. The support of family ancestors ensures progress of their area or their lineage. They organize events or happenings that will renew and strengthen the relationships with their ancestors.

6 0

2 years ago

The word "___" began to be used instead of "the colonies."

LenKa [72]

Answer: I believe it is D. :) can i have brainliest?

6 0

2 years ago

Which action is most likely to be taken by local political party rather than state or national party

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Endorsing a presidential candidate is more likely to be done by a national party than a local party.

Explanation:

This is because when it's local, it's usually in support of local elected officials. It has nothing to do with national officials. However, when it is a national party, they could endorse a presidential candidate because that is ultimately more important and affects all people- hence the national. This is because whoever is chosen in such an important election changes the future of a country, and is something national organizations should deal with- not local ones.

7 0

3 years ago