What is the major difference between the majority and dissenting opinions on false speech and the Stolen Valor Act?

2 answers:

8 0

The majority writes that false speech is protected as long as it does not cause harm. The writer worries that the Stolen Valor Act would set a dangerous precedent for future laws. The dissent believes that false speech is rarely protected by the First Amendment, and the Act is constitutional.

adell [148]3 years ago

7 0

I believe the answer is: Stolen Valor had a punishment if a person lie, but in false speech the person is protected by the first amendment the freedom of speech

The 'lies' that covered by stolen valor are the ones that being done to illegally obtain money, properties or other forms of tangible benefits from other people. False speech on the other hand, tend to be political or ideological in nature and being done as a form of persuasion.

You might be interested in

The president can ________

olga nikolaevna [1]

Answer:

The President can make laws and go anywhere he wants with permission from the supreme court and the law, also he would have to make an appointment, for example : he cant just walk into a military base while they are testing planes. For laws he can make them and if they get declined by the supreme court he can Veto which would let the law pass immediately

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Dr. mastick believes that language is a uniquely human accomplishment etched into the structure of the brain. dr. mastick's view

tester [92]

The answer is "Nativism".

According to Noam Chomsky as he said “the rules of sentence organization are too complex to be directly taught to even a cognitively sophisticated young child.” The fundamental hypothesize of Universal Grammar is that a specific arrangement of structural standards are built in to people, autonomous of tactile experience.

4 0

3 years ago

Carmen writes, "When I was in high school, there were different groups such as ‘preps,' ‘hoods,' and ‘nerds.' It was easy to tel

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

d. internalization

Explanation:

Carmen is describing internalization. Internalization in sociology is the acceptance of a set of norms and values established by a set of people. In the statement Carmen is explaining how there were different types of groups in her High School. These groups were set by the students. She describes that these groups were simple to spot because of their appearance and that “people should already know where to go”. This is an example of a pre-conception concept, that if you didn’t match to any of the groups then you shouldn’t be with them. In some way the people of the school already internalized this “norms” and followed them.

7 0

3 years ago

Which World War Il leader came to power by

oee [108]

Answer:

The 1919 Treaty of Paris ended World War I, but imposed heavy penalties on ... When Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1934, his government began to ... How did Wilson's Fourteen Points influence the terms of the Treaty of Versailles? .... the US is able to pull other countries into its own international conflicts, and it ...

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

In accordance with Maslow's way of thinking, if Erin secured a good-paying job that paid her enough to live in a decent apartmen

pishuonlain [190]

Answer: The correct answer is: Focus on her next level of needs.

Explanation: According to Maslow's theory of the hierarchy of needs, human beings have their needs organized in a pyramid.

The needs that are at the bottom of the pyramid must be satisfied for the individual to start satisfying the needs that are higher up. The need for security is lower in the hierarchy than the social needs.

In this particular case, Erin already satisfied her needs of security because she already secured a good-paying job, a decent apartment, and an economical car, she also feels safe in her home, therefore, she now can move on to attend the needs that follow up in the hierarchy, which are social needs.

5 0

3 years ago