Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
A) sample size = 23.475 ≈ 23
B) How to tell someone to do the test is by taking a sampling process of a lot of the products because this will help to figure out defective units in the line of production and also ensure that the quality of the products are up to the same quality required
Explanation:
Data given
AQL = 20%, = 0.2
LTPD = 52% = 0.52
Assuming consumer risk acceptable by company = 10%
producer risk = 5%
A) First we calculate the ratio
= LTPD / AQL = 0.52 / 0.2 = 2.6
from the table of LTPD/AQL 2.6 is closest to 2.768
to calculate the sample size we apply the formula from the exhibit table
n ( AQL ) = 4.695
Therefore n ( sample size ) = 4.695 / 0.2 = 23.475
B) How to tell someone to do the test is by taking a sampling process of a lot of the products because this will help to figure out defective units in the line of production and also ensure that the quality of the products are up to the same quality required
Answer:
Explanation:
incorrect answer
a credit balance of $7500
correct answer
a debit balance of $7500.
Answer:
B)
Explanation:
Reese can recover from Alex.
Answer and Explanation:
The adjustment should be as follows
Unearned Rent Revenue $47,400
To Rent Revenue $47,400
(Being recording of revenue earned is recorded)
Here unearned rent revenue is debited as it decreased the liabilities and the rent revenue is credited as it increased the revenue. Also liabilities and revenue contains the normal debit balance
The working is shown below:
= $71,100 × 8 months ÷ 12 months
= $47,400
The eight months are calculated from May 1 to December 31
