The answer is A. True
Hope this helps.
- Max
Answer:
Actor/observer bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the actor/observer bias refers to the tendency to attribute our own actions to external causes while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes.
When the results of a situation are negative, if the negative outcome happened to the person, the person will likely attribute the outcome to external circumstances. But when it comes to other people, the person will attribute the outcome to the other person behaviors, habits or actions.
In this example, Jeremiah falls and thinks the ice is brutal. <u>He is attributing the fall to an external circumstance (the ice)</u>. But then, when his friend Ed falls on the same spot, he says his friend is really clumsy, <u>attributing the fall to an inner characteristic of his friend</u>. Therefore, this would be an example of actor/observer bias.
The correct answer to the assertion and reason is D. A is wrong but R is correct
<h3>What is an Assertion?</h3>
This refers to the statement that is meant to be proven by the use of a valid supporting detail.
Hence, we can see the given assertion that modern farming methods decrease the yield of production, there is a need to show a valid reason and this is not done, hence, we can conclude that option D is correct because A is wrong but R is correct.
Read more about assertions here:
brainly.com/question/25241318
#SPJ1
Answer:
an 'imminent' lawless action
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the government can only restrict speech when it incites an 'imminent' lawless action. This means that freedom of speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker is trying to incite a violation of any law and the action is imminent and likely.
