<em>Hey</em><em>!</em><em>!</em>
<em>Here</em><em>'s</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em>:</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>highest</em><em>/</em><em>most</em><em> </em><em>populated </em><em>district </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>Rajasthan</em><em>.</em><em>T</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>population</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>6</em><em>6</em><em>2</em><em>6</em><em>1</em><em>7</em><em>8</em><em>.</em>
<em>Jaipur</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>also</em><em> </em><em>known</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>pink</em><em> </em><em>city</em><em>.</em>
<em>H</em><em>ope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
All sources will have some element of bias in them due to the fact that they are products of a specific person's (or specific people's) views. The best ways to deal with bias are 1) to acknowledge the bias and comment on it, 2) to include several sources with differing biases and discuss their differences, or 3) the analyze what the existence of the bias might indicate about the issue.
Answer: skepticism; Humility.
Explanation:
Okay, let us fill in the gaps in the question given above;
''In psychology class, Paul claims that women are more empathic than men. If Anna asks, "How do you know?" she is demonstrating the scientific attitude of SKEPTICISM. If Paul immediately questioned his own statement, he would be demonstrating the scientific attitude of HUMILITY''.
PS: The two words in capital letters are the words to fill in the gap.
Okay, so let us define the meaning of skepticism. Skepticism is a kind of behaviour or attitude in which one doubt and question a fact or an idea. Looking at the question, we can see that Anna has a skeptical Behavior/attitude toward what Paul said asking him(Paul) how he knew that women are more empathic than men. This type of scientific attitude is known as skepticism.
Assuming Paul immediately questioned his own statement, Paul is said to be demonstrating the scientific attitude of HUMILITY, questioning your own belief.
Their primary goal is to connect problems of individuals with the boarder social structures and sets of cultural values
:)